Re: WG D9100 vs U3100


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Build Your Own Arcade Controls message board ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by jmark on 6, 2000 at 2:15 PM:

In Reply to: Re: WG D9100 vs U3100 posted by Fultra on 6, 2000 at 1:37 PM:

: So, to answer your question... You will not go wrong with the U3100. In fact, I've never heard anyone that didn't like their U3100.

: Are ya sold yet?

ALMOST!! What about degaussing - I'm planning on building a rotating support and of course a degauss 'button' would be far more convenient than a separate coil!! Of course, I could do what the guy at the attached link did and build a circuit to automatically deguass upon rotation, but I'm definitely NOT that technically astute!

BTW, this might be a dumb question, but are the resolution modes shown on the WG website the only ones supported, or are these the MAXIMUM resolutions - i.e. does the U3100 support such resolutions as 336x240 - obviously 680x480 would suffice in this case, but in games such as SmashTV which use a resolution not easily converted, you run the risk of 'missing' part of the screen... am I overanalyzing or missing something really stupid here?!?




Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Build Your Own Arcade Controls message board ] [ FAQ ]