Responce to feedback


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Build Your Own Arcade Controls message board ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Ron Michallick on 29, 2001 at 8:55 AM:

In Reply to: MK64 inquiry posted by Mojo2000 on 26, 2001 at 9:09 AM:

: I have visited Ron Michallik's website several : times, trying to figure out whether his devices : would be as friendly as the I-Pac. I couldn't
: reach that conclusion

The web page could use some work, but I have
little interest in web page design. Of course
suggestions are always welcome.

I'm not sure what you mean by "friendly". I'll
assume that means simple, easy to setup. I agree
that the IPAC is better for novices in this way.

I believe that competition and variety is good
for this hobby. I may be mistaken, but I also
believe that I'm indirectly (twice removed)
responsible for getting Andy to make the I-PAC
programmable and keyboard bi-directional. We
were competing for the favor of a control panel
manufacturer a while back.

: What do you make of the MK's reprogramming :process? What I observed on the page was wayyyyy :more obtuse than the I-Pac, which in contrast :appears so straghtforward and user-friendly to a :non-programmer like me.

Was it the "INaaaaannwk" syntax? I was trying to
make the script flexible to user preferences.
It would be clearer if I made the syntax more
ridged. I wouldn't mind if a rogue programmer
wrote a GUI version for me. Hint,hint.

Happy Gaming,
Ron.


Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Build Your Own Arcade Controls message board ] [ FAQ ]