Re: MacMame Vs Mame for PC (DOS/32)


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Build Your Own Arcade Controls message board ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Joshua on 26, 2001 at 7:02 PM:

In Reply to: MacMame Vs Mame for PC (DOS/32) posted by Anthony Martin on 26, 2001 at 11:24 AM:

Yeah, I'm running MacMAME, and the ATI RAGE graphics mode looks smooth and nice, and all the games cruise along... (except S.T.U.N. Runner and N.A.R.C...) In general I'm much happier w/MAME on my Mac than on my friend's PC, but I'm kind of a Mac snob too.

only 2 problems with Mac emulation: MAME releases are always well behind the PC release (and unlike Windows users, we can't just revert back to the DOS version) and the other more "dedicated" emulators (Callus, etc, never make it to Mac)
I bought a Mac because I'm a graphic designer and they just made sense to me, but now that I've discovered emulation, I'm even happier - and I've had to move all my Illustrator and Photoshop files to CD to make room for all those NeoGeo roms :)

: I just saw a Macintosh the other day running MacMame. It looked great. It has some visual thing going on that makes the image looks like an arcade monitor (Not just scanlines). Is there a way to get mame or mame32 to look as good as the MacMame? After looking at it on a Macintosh I am thinking that a Mac might be a better choice for my projects brain. Any thoughts.




Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Build Your Own Arcade Controls message board ] [ FAQ ]